[pull] master from supabase:master - #1126
Merged
Merged
Conversation
<!-- ccr-slack-attribution --> _Requested by **Nicole Kramer** · [Slack thread](https://supabase.slack.com/archives/C0161K73J1J/p1785399057853249?thread_ts=1785399057.853249&cid=C0161K73J1J)_ ## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? Content update — moves the Data Processing Addendum's effective date out by two months. ## What is the current behavior? The DPA page at `/legal/customer-resources/data-processing-addendum` shows "Version 1 — June 1, 2026" in the version selector, and the document body opens with "Last Modified: 1 June 2026". ## What is the new behavior? Both now read August 1, 2026: the version selector shows "Version 1 — August 1, 2026" and the document opens with "Last Modified: 1 August 2026". ## Additional context The page renders a hardcoded `versions` array through the shared `LegalDocVersions` component, so the effective date lives in the TSX file; the "Last Modified" line is simply the first line of the MDX content file. Both were updated, each keeping its file's existing date format (`M D, YYYY` in the TSX, `D Month YYYY` in the MDX). No other content changed. ### Not changed — flagging for confirmation The same June 1, 2026 date appears on a few other surfaces. I left them alone because they are either different documents or point at a dated PDF asset that would need to be re-generated and re-uploaded. Let me know if any of these should move too: - `apps/www/pages/legal/dpa.tsx` — the legacy `/legal/dpa` page, which links `Supabase+DPA+260601.pdf` - `apps/studio/components/interfaces/Organization/Documents/DPA.tsx` — Studio links that same PDF - `apps/www/pages/legal/customer-resources/subprocessor-list.tsx` — the subprocessor list (`June-1-2026.pdf` and a "June 1, 2026" label); a separate document - `apps/www/pages/aup.mdx` — the Acceptable Use Policy, "Last Modified: 1 June 2026"; a separate document Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
<!-- ccr-slack-attribution --> _Requested by **Nicole Kramer** · [Slack thread](https://supabase.slack.com/archives/C0161K73J1J/p1785399344523739)_ ## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? Content update — adds a new version of the Terms of Service to the marketing site (`apps/www`). ## What is the current behavior? `/terms` offers two versions in the version dropdown: **Version 2 (May 6, 2026)**, shown by default, and **Version 1 (July 11, 2025)**. ## What is the new behavior? `/terms` shows **Version 3 (August 1, 2026)** by default. Version 2 and Version 1 are still selectable from the version dropdown (`/terms?version=v2`, `/terms?version=v1`) and are completely unchanged. Two files: - **New:** `apps/www/data/legal/terms/v3.mdx` — the full v3 Terms of Service. - **Changed:** `apps/www/pages/terms.tsx` — imports `V3` and prepends it to the `versions` array. Newest-first ordering is required, because `LegalDocVersions` treats `versions[0]` as the latest. ## Additional context ### The legal text is a verbatim transcription — please review it as such It comes from a Word document supplied by Legal, converted with pandoc and then verified character-exact against the source: **8055 words, 136 blocks, 0 word-level diffs**. Prettier was run over the file and changed nothing. **Known typos in the source document were deliberately preserved. Please do not correct them in review:** - §1 Definitions contains a **duplicate `d.`** — one `d.` introduces the Data Processing Addendum definition and the very next item is also lettered `d.` for the Documentation definition. The list therefore runs a, b, c, d, d, e … Re-lettering would shift internal cross-references, so it is left exactly as drafted. - §12(d) Survival contains a **doubled “and”** — *and Sections 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13, and 14 survive*. Also preserved verbatim from the source: curly quotes on the Data Processing Addendum definition only (every other defined term uses straight quotes), and non-breaking spaces around the hyperlinks. ### Date The source document carries **no date line of its own**, even though its §14(d) states that the last-modified date *will be updated at the top of this Agreement*. August 1, 2026 was specified by the requester, and is placed in the `_Last Modified: 1 August 2026_` line at the top of the MDX, following the v1/v2 convention. As with v1 and v2, the `.mdx` uses `D Month YYYY` while `effectiveDate` in `terms.tsx` uses US long form (`August 1, 2026`). That split is pre-existing and intentional. ### New DPA link §1 of v3 links the Data Processing Addendum page at `/legal/customer-resources/data-processing-addendum`. This link is new relative to v2, and the DPA is also incorporated by reference in §7(b). ### No overlap with the concurrent DPA branch This PR touches only `apps/www/data/legal/terms/v3.mdx` and `apps/www/pages/terms.tsx` — **zero file overlap** with the branch updating the DPA page dates. ### Reviewer checklist - 14 numbered sections (1 Definitions → 14 Miscellaneous), 44 lettered subsections, 6 roman sub-subsections. - ALL-CAPS acceptance block at the top; ALL-CAPS AI disclaimer at the end of §9(b); ALL-CAPS §11 Limitations of Liability. - Three link targets intact: the DPA page, `https://supabase.com/privacy`, and `mailto:legal@supabase.io` (×3). Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
<!-- ccr-slack-attribution --> _Requested by **Nicole Kramer** · [Slack thread](https://supabase.slack.com/archives/C0161K73J1J/p1785399555203219)_ ## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? Content update — a new version of a published legal agreement. ## What is the current behavior? The version selector on `/enterprise-terms` offers two versions of the Enterprise SaaS Subscription Agreement: Version 2 (May 6, 2026) and Version 1 (April 17, 2026). Version 2 is what the page shows by default. ## What is the new behavior? **Before:** opening `/enterprise-terms` showed Version 2 — May 6, 2026. **After:** it shows **Version 3 — August 1, 2026**. Versions 2 and 1 are unchanged and still reachable from the dropdown (`?version=v2`, `?version=v1`). Two files change: - **New** `apps/www/data/legal/enterprise-terms/v3.mdx` — the Version 3 text, transcribed from the source Word document supplied in the Slack thread (`2026.07.29 - Supabase - Enterprise Terms.docx`). - `apps/www/pages/enterprise-terms.tsx` — imports the new MDX and prepends `{ id: 'v3', label: 'Version 3', effectiveDate: 'August 1, 2026', Component: V3 }` to the `versions` array. Since the array is newest-first, v3 becomes the default. ## Additional context ### Transcription fidelity The legal text was not edited, reworded, reordered, or corrected — only re-rendered in the MDX conventions already used by `v1.mdx` and `v2.mdx`. This was verified mechanically rather than by eye: markdown markup was stripped from `v3.mdx` and the result diffed paragraph-by-paragraph against text extracted directly from the source document's OOXML. - **137 paragraphs in the source, 137 in `v3.mdx`, 0 differing.** - 14 top-level sections and 48 subsections, matching the source's heading counts exactly. - All 3 distinct URLs preserved, written as bare URLs per the existing convention in this file family (remark-gfm autolinks them). - Pure ASCII apart from 5 `§` characters in the 48 C.F.R. citations, matching `v1.mdx`/`v2.mdx`. - Prettier clean; no British spellings that would trip the US-locale misspell check. Formatting decisions worth knowing: the source document contains no bold or italic runs at all, but `v1.mdx` and `v2.mdx` both bold defined terms and section numbers, so v3 follows that house style for consistent rendering across the three versions. The source also carries no date or version line of its own; the `_Last Modified: 1 August 2026_` first line is repo convention, matching how every other legal MDX in `apps/www/data/legal/` is written. ### What changed from v2, in the legal text Structure is identical — same 14 sections, same 48 subsection titles. Five substantive prose changes: 1. **Preamble** — the effective date is now "the date of last signature of an Order referencing these terms", replacing v2's unfilled `[Deal.CloseDate]` merge-field placeholder. "Signature block below" becomes "signature block in an Order". 2. **New § 1.4 "Data Processing Addendum"** — defined by reference to `https://supabase.com/legal/customer-resources/data-processing-addendum`, with a carve-out for a separately executed agreement covering the same subject matter. Former § 1.4–1.12 shift to § 1.5–1.13; nothing was removed or reordered. 3. **§ 7.2 Data Processing** replaced — v2's GDPR / UK GDPR / Swiss clause is gone, replaced by a general compliance paragraph that incorporates the Data Processing Addendum into the Agreement. 4. **§ 13.3** cross-reference corrected from Section 10.1 (Mutual) to Section 10.3 (Limited Warranty), which is the clause the refund remedy actually depends on. 5. **§ 14.4 Amendment and Modification** rewritten — v2 required a writing executed by both Parties; v3 gives Supabase a unilateral right to modify by posting a revised version at `https://supabase.com/enterprise-terms`, effective the first day of the following calendar month, or at the start of the next Renewal Subscription Period for Orders with a fixed Subscription Period of 12 months or longer, with non-renewal under § 13.1 as Customer's sole and exclusive remedy. Two things carried over verbatim from the source rather than fixed, since the text must not be edited: § 7.2 is now near-duplicative of § 7.1 (three of its four sentences repeat § 7.1 almost word for word), and "HIPAA" is used in both § 7.1 and § 7.2 without being defined. One pre-existing inconsistency, unrelated to this change: `v2.mdx`'s own first line reads `_Last Modified: 1 May 2026_` while the page lists Version 2's effective date as `May 6, 2026`. Left alone here. ### Overlap with concurrent work Two sibling changes are in flight for the same requester today — one adjusting the new Data Processing Addendum page's dates, one publishing Terms of Service v3. Neither touches these two files, but all three touch the `apps/www/data/legal/` tree, and note that § 1.4 above now links to the DPA page. [#48483](#48483) removes the `_Last Modified:` first line from every versioned legal MDX, on the principle that the version selector should be the only place a date appears. It is sequenced to land after this PR, and its file list predates `v3.mdx`. A three-way merge of the two branches is clean, but whoever rebases #48483 should add `apps/www/data/legal/enterprise-terms/v3.mdx` to that removal — otherwise v3 keeps a body date after v1 and v2 lose theirs. The `_Last Modified: 1 May 2026` / `May 6, 2026` mismatch on v2 is also handled in #48483 and is deliberately left alone here, so the same line isn't touched by two PRs. Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
<!-- ccr-slack-attribution --> _Requested by **Francesco Sansalvadore, Nicole Kramer** · [Slack thread](https://supabase.slack.com/archives/C0161K73J1J/p1785399057853249?thread_ts=1785399057.853249&cid=C0161K73J1J)_ ## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? Refactor of the marketing site's legal pages, plus two small content fixes (removal of duplicated dates, two heading corrections) and two permanent redirects. ## What is the current behavior? The documents linked from the Legal Hub are built three different ways: - `/terms` and `/enterprise-terms` render a plain inline heading with no breadcrumbs. - `/sla`, `/support-policy`, `/aup` and `/privacy` are standalone MDX pages carrying their own layout. - `/legal/dpa` has a one-off centered heading and grid of its own. On top of that, the documents that already have a version selector *also* print a "Last Modified" line inside the document body, so the same fact is stated twice on the page. On `/terms` and `/enterprise-terms` the two statements disagree: the selector says "Version 2 — May 6, 2026" while the body says "Last Modified: 1 May 2026". `/privacy` handles its history differently again — earlier versions live at their own archived URLs (`/privacy-260316` and `/privacy-250528`), strung together by "Previous Version" links at the bottom of each page. ## What is the new behavior? Every legal page now renders through one shell: `PageHeader` with a `PageBreadcrumb`, so the Legal Hub is one click away from any document. - The duplicate "Last Modified" rows are removed from the five versioned documents. The version selector is now the single place a date appears. - `/aup` and `/privacy` gain the version selector. - `/privacy`'s three historical versions are now selectable from the one page, and the two old archived URLs permanently redirect to it. - `/sla` and `/support-policy` pick up the shell and breadcrumbs but intentionally show neither a date nor a selector — neither document has ever carried one, and Legal asked that the SLA stay that way for now. Implementation-wise the canonical pattern is the one the Data Processing Addendum page was already using: `DefaultLayout` > `NextSeo` > `PageHeader` (with a `breadcrumb` slot) > `MDXProvider` > `SectionContainer className="prose"` > `LegalDocVersions`. The standalone MDX pages were moved to `apps/www/data/legal/<slug>/vN.mdx` as bare content partials, with a new TSX shell taking over the original route. No route changed except the two archived privacy pages, which redirect. Dates were carried across from the "Last Modified" lines being deleted rather than invented: `/aup` becomes Version 1 — June 1, 2026, and privacy v1/v2/v3 become May 28 2025, March 16 2026 and May 13 2026. ## Additional context **This is a stacked PR.** It is sequenced behind three PRs that touch the same files and should land first: the Terms of Service v3 bump, the Enterprise SaaS Subscription Agreement v3 bump, and #48481 (DPA effective date → August 1, 2026). #48481 edits the very "Last Modified" line this PR removes from the DPA content file, so a trivial conflict there is expected. This branch will be rebased onto master before it leaves draft. **Two contracts now contain a clause that no longer describes the page.** `apps/www/data/legal/terms/v1.mdx` and `v2.mdx` — and the same sentence in the MPPA and both integration-partner addenda — still read "The date on which the Agreement was last modified will be updated at the top of this Agreement". There is no longer a date in the document body; it sits in the version selector above it. Left untouched here because it is contract text, but Legal should re-word it. **The date mismatch is resolved in favour of the selector.** On `/terms` and `/enterprise-terms`, deleting the body line leaves May 6, 2026 as the only date on the page. Nicole Kramer confirmed in Slack that May 6 is the correct date. **Two headings change visibly**, to line up with the labels used on the Legal Hub: "Terms of service" → "Terms of Service", and "Service Level Agreements" → "Service Level Agreement". **`/legal/dpa` now looks almost identical to `/legal/customer-resources/data-processing-addendum`** — same heading, same breadcrumb, different content. The legacy page is a PDF download plus a signing flow and was deliberately left live, but the overlap is more obvious than it was. Redirecting it to the versioned page is the natural follow-up; it is not done here. **Build verification was incomplete in this environment.** `pnpm install` could not finish because `npm.jsr.io` is blocked by network policy (403), so `next build` never gave a real signal. What did run and pass: - `tsc --noEmit` on `apps/www`, with output byte-identical to clean master - ESLint on every changed file — 0 errors - Prettier using the repo's actual config - a direct MDX compile of all 14 `data/legal/**/*.mdx` files using the app's own MDX options The one thing left unverified is webpack resolving `ui-patterns/PrivacySettings` from the privacy content's new directory. CI will confirm that. Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The [User Management → Deleting users](https://supabase.com/docs/guides/auth/managing-user-data) section warned that deleting a user does not sign them out, but did not say what to do about it. Adds a **Removing account access** subsection: revoke sessions before deleting, why a soft-delete flag or [ban](https://supabase.com/docs/reference/javascript/auth-admin-updateuserbyid) is not a substitute, and the residual [access-token window](https://supabase.com/docs/guides/auth/sessions) after revocation. Fills a docs gap surfaced by [supabase/agent-skills#194](supabase/agent-skills#194) while investigating the [`investigate-auth-001-deleted-user-access`](https://github.com/supabase/evals/blob/main/evals/investigate-auth-001-deleted-user-access/PROMPT.md) eval scenario. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Documentation** * Updated the “Deleting users” guidance to specify deleting via `auth.admin.deleteUser()` (with `shouldSoftDelete: false`) and clarify that this cascades to sessions, invalidates refresh tokens, and blocks new access-token minting. * Rewrote the explanation to emphasize that it does not substitute for temporary bans or application-level “deleted” states. * Clarified the access-token window: already-issued stateless JWTs remain valid until `exp`, and recommended mitigations include short JWT expiry and enforcing session validation (via `session_id`) for sensitive actions. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Chores** * Updated Next.js, PostCSS, and tar package versions. * Added the required TypeScript native tooling where needed. * Refined package configuration and dependency ordering across the project. * Removed an unused empty dependency configuration. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
…8452) ## What PR 6 of the SQL-editor "query source (Database vs Logs)" stack (builds on the merged PR 5, #48414). Adds the user-facing toolbar surface for the logs query source and consolidates the SQL-editor toolbar into a single **source menu**. Everything stays behind `sqlEditorLogsSource` + `otelLegacyLogs` (dual-flag gated); with the flags off the toolbar is unchanged. ## Changes - **Consolidated source menu** (`QuerySourceMenu`) — one `Database ▾` / `Logs ▾` dropdown that both labels the snippet's source and hosts the source-specific controls as flyout submenus: - Database: database selector (`Primary` / read replicas), `Run as` (role impersonation), and `Row limit`. - Logs: `Time range` — the same relative presets as the Logs Explorer plus a `Custom range…` calendar dialog. - **Source is immutable** — the Database/Logs rows aren't a toggle. An existing (materialized) snippet opens a *fresh* tab of the target source (never reinterpreting a query against the wrong backend); a blank new tab re-flavors in place. Extracted as the pure, unit-tested `resolveSourceSwitch`. - **New-snippet-with-source** threaded through `/sql/new?source=`, the nav "Create a new logs query" entry, and the duplicate flow. Logs snippets hide the (db-dialect) Export action. - **Run-affordance guard** — the Run button is disabled + annotated for a logs snippet on a non-ClickHouse org (sits above PR 5's execution short-circuit). - **Retention entitlement gating** — both preset and custom logs ranges past `log.retention_days` surface the upgrade prompt instead of applying silently. Prettify is disabled for logs (sql-formatter mangles ClickHouse). ## Tests - `querySource.test.ts` — `logDateRangesEqual` (structural relative/absolute matching, incl. the "Last hour" vs "Last 1 hour" label case). - `QuerySourceMenu.utils.test.ts` — `resolveSourceSwitch` push-vs-replace / no-op behavior. `pnpm --filter studio typecheck` · `lint:ratchet` · Prettier · SQL editor suite (307 tests) all green. ## For reviewers To test manually, enable the `sqlEditorLogsSource` feature flag for yourself on local/staging. There is no nav for Log SQL snippets currently (that is by design, this PR is big enough as-is), so to check an existing logs snippet, you can create one using the existing Logs Explorer, copy its UUID, and force navigate to that snippet in the SQL editor via URL. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **New Features** * Added support for creating and switching between database and logs queries. * Added log time-range presets and custom date-range selection. * Added database, run-as role, and row-limit controls. * Added read-replica selection, including options to create a new replica when available. * **Improvements** * Added clearer explanations when query execution is unavailable. * Disabled SQL formatting and query export where unsupported for logs queries. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Joshen Lim <joshenlimek@gmail.com>
…ugging (#48243) ## Summary - Renames the **Telemetry** nav section to **Monitoring and Debugging** (nav label + sidebar title) - Rewrites the section overview (`telemetry.mdx`) as a clean navigation page using `ContentListings` — three panels (Debugging / Monitoring / AI & automation) with no how-to prose - Adds new `telemetry.data.ts` content-listings data file with three groups registered in `index.ts` - Adds a new **Debugging** guide (`debugging.mdx`) — request-stack model, symptom-to-layer router with troubleshooting links for every service, logging guidance - Adds cross-links between `debugging.mdx`, `logs.mdx`, and `advanced-log-filtering.mdx` - Adds a new **AI agents and MCP** page (`ai-agents.mdx`) — MCP tools table, `get_logs` usage, debugging skill workflow - Restructures sidebar into three groups: **Debugging** / **Monitoring** / **AI & automation** ## Motivation - No central entry point existed for debugging — content was scattered across products with no index - The overview page had almost no links for agents to follow - The section name "Telemetry" caused confusion (also used for CLI usage telemetry) - Unblocks the `supabase` debugging skill, which routes agents to this section as its source of truth ## Test plan - [ ] `/docs/guides/telemetry` — three ContentListings panels render, no prose how-to text - [ ] `/docs/guides/telemetry.md` (markdown) — clean link list, navigable by LLMs - [ ] `/docs/guides/telemetry/debugging` — renders correctly, symptom table links resolve - [ ] `/docs/guides/telemetry/ai-agents` — new page renders correctly - [ ] Sidebar shows 3 groups: Debugging / Monitoring / AI & automation - [ ] All cross-links between debugging, logs, and advanced-log-filtering resolve <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary - **New Features** - Added new documentation coverage for AI agent–assisted monitoring and debugging, including an observability-driven troubleshooting workflow. - **Documentation** - Updated the “Telemetry” area to “Monitoring and Debugging” with a refreshed landing page and reorganized sections (Debugging, Monitoring, and AI). - Revised the debugging and logs guides to improve step-by-step guidance and highlight advanced log filtering. - **Navigation** - Renamed and restructured the top-level navigation entry to reflect the new Monitoring and Debugging content layout. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Jeremias Menichelli <jmenichelli@gmail.com>
…are not in view (#48454) ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? There are some expensive queries that are requested every time the Billing Settings page loads, some of them happen for components that are outside of the initial viewport. We can avoid performing those requests unless the user explicitly scrolls to the relevant section. A similar pattern has been implemented in the past for the Credit Balance section in #45481. I decided to skip the lazy load pattern in the components that appear at the top of the Billing Settings (Subscription and Cost Control). ## What is the current behavior? When loading the billing settings page, all components (except CreditBalance) will perform requests to load the data they need. ## What is the new behavior? The components will perform the request to load their data until they are inside the viewport. You can verify this by opening the developer tools and monitor the requests as you scroll through the page. ## Testing These changes can be easily tested by making your browser's height very short then opening the org billing settings `/org/{slug}/billing`. Open the developer tools and filter for XHR requests. As you scroll through the page, the requests will be made. To verify that all potential requests are covered, I compared the requests done during a fresh load with another settings page, the only extra requests made by the billing settings page are the ones relevant to the components at the very top (or the BillingSettings container itself, which requests the subscription). <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Performance Improvements** * Billing, payment methods, billing customer details, upcoming invoices, and invoice lists now load only when their sections scroll into view, reducing initial loading. * Existing access/permission checks are still applied before fetching billing-related data. * **Tests** * Updated billing and invoices tests to mock viewport intersection behavior (IntersectionObserver) to match the new lazy-loading behavior. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
#48488) PR description: ## Summary - Clicking Feedback → Issue → Contact support was navigating to `/support/new` (the old full-page form) instead of opening the integrated sidebar support form - Fixed by setting a `helpPanelState.requestedView` signal before opening the Help sidebar, so it opens directly at the support form view - Added a small valtio store (`state/help-panel-state.ts`) to communicate the desired view between `FeedbackDropdown` and `HelpPanel` ## Test plan - [ ] Feedback → Issue → Contact support opens the Help sidebar at the support form (not `/support/new`) - [ ] Help button → Contact support still works as before - [ ] Closing and reopening the Help sidebar via the Help button opens at the home view <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **New Features** * Selecting **Support** from the Help menu now opens the Help Panel directly to the Support view. * The Help Panel automatically updates to the requested section when opened. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Fix the `<RadioGroupCard>` focus state design Before: <img width="676" height="117" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/39849fd3-e6de-43dc-b4d7-67edcce3812d" /> After: <img width="741" height="167" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/13dad707-bc63-48da-8574-eb3d90b29625" /> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Style** * Updated radio group card selection styling for a cleaner, more consistent focus and checked-state appearance. * Added improved outline handling for radio group card items. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )